http://piltonsucks.com/2006/12/30/damage-limitation/ You mean it is THIS bad? Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:43:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2 http://piltonsucks.com/2006/12/30/damage-limitation/#comment-948 admin Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:35:22 +0000 http://piltonsucks.com/2006/12/30/damage-limitation/#comment-948 Its up to the voters,but her time is up. Its up to the voters,but her time is up.

]]> http://piltonsucks.com/2006/12/30/damage-limitation/#comment-821 dejavu Sun, 07 Jan 2007 02:40:38 +0000 http://piltonsucks.com/2006/12/30/damage-limitation/#comment-821 The letter you refer to I have read Loco Liz appears to be using her power as a councillor to threaten people in print this is nothing short of bully tactics which she feels she has a god-given right to administer. Obviously there is an election due in May and as her majority at the polls were down last time she is afraid that just maybe her crown appears to be slipping . The writer of the letter asked loco Liz why she insulted an activist at the Waterfront Summit and in due political fashion she avoided the question that was being asked of her . The quicker the community gets rid of her the better perhaps she is not legally wrong but her gains from the Granton Ward to promote only herself is MORALLY wrong The letter you refer to I have read Loco Liz appears to be using her power as a councillor to threaten people in print this is nothing short of bully tactics which she feels she has a god-given right to administer. Obviously there is an election due in May and as her majority at the polls were down last time she is afraid that just maybe her crown appears to be slipping . The writer of the letter asked loco Liz why she insulted an activist at the Waterfront Summit and in due political fashion she avoided the question that was being asked of her . The quicker the community gets rid of her the better perhaps she is not legally wrong but her gains from the Granton Ward to promote only herself is MORALLY wrong

]]>